Sample case summary of carlill v carbolic smoke ball co  2 qb 484 prepared by claire macken facts: • carbolic smoke ball co (def) promises in ad to pay 100 pounds to any person who contracts flu after using smoke ball.
The carbolic smoke ball company introduced a product called “smoke ball” as a cure for influenza and a number of other diseases as well in the context of the flu pandemic 1889-1890 they published a news paper advertisement in pall mall gazette and other news papers 13 th november 1891 claiming that they would pay £100 if anyone gets sick with influenza after using this product according to the correct directions. Analysis of the case:- an advertisement with vague statement and promise can turned out to be a legal and binding contract like the case between carlil vs carbolic smoke ball co ltd carbolic smoke ball co ltd can claim that it was merely invitation to treat for as their promotional tool for their smoke ball as a remedy for influenza epidemic.
The defendant carbolic smoke ball co ltd published an advertisement offering that they would pay a sum of £100 to anyone who got contracted with influenza after using its product following the instructions provided with the smoke ball.
Italic text facts: the chimbuto smoke ball company made a product called the smoke ball which claimed to be a cure for influenza and a number of other diseases the company published carlill v carbolic smoke ball co | case brief wiki | fandom powered by wikia. The defendant, the carbolic smoke ball company of london (defendant), placed an advertisement in several newspapers on november 13, 1891, stating that its product, “the carbolic smoke ball”, when used three times daily, for two weeks, would prevent colds and influenza.
Carlill v carbolic smoke ball company  ewca civ 1 is an english contract law decision by the court of appeal it is notable for its curious subject matter and how the influential judges (particularly lindley lj and bowen lj) developed the law in inventive ways.
Case analysis: case: carlill v carbolic smoke ball company  1 qb 256 introduction: carlill v carbolic smoke ball company ltd is one of the most leading cases in the law of contracts under common law. Carbolic smoke ball also established that acceptance of such an offer does not require notification once a party purchases the item and meets the condition, the contract is active it also established that such a purchase is an example of consideration and therefore legitimises the contract. Carbolic smoke ball is a company case analysis: case: carlill v carbolic smoke ball company  1 qb 256 introduction: carlill v carbolic smoke ball company ltd is one of the most leading cases in the law of contracts under common law known for both its academic importance and its contribution in the development of the laws relating.