1787 this compromise was between the large and small states of the colonies the great compromise resolved that there would be representation by population in the house of representatives, and equal representation would exist in the senate each state, regardless of size, would have 2 senators all tax bills and revenues would originate in the house. Why do historians disagree two obvious points are (1) that historical explanation and description involve - can especially with something that happened a very long time ago, there aren't many primary sources, so historians have to rely on material recorded decades or even centuries after the event occurred if these secondary. Historians will always disagree about everything related to history although sometimes the disagreement will be minor if you are feeling brave have a look into holocaust denial and the different levels that are in that bracket. Why have historians disagreed about the success of the vienna settlement the vienna settlement (1814-1815) was made up of not one but three sets of negotiations the first treaty of paris (may 1814), which was made just after the french revolution, was convened to prevent europe before french expansion.
It is a very simple reason why historians disagree even when they are looking at the same evidence history was recorded by men (males) in the beginning since men were the only ones who had the privilege to learn how to read and write i am sure there were women who could read and write as well but i am sure they didn't have such an important. George washington's quote, we have probably had too good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation explains the purposes of the founding fathers in that men will not adopt and follow rules of society without the intervention of a coercive power, such as the government.
The reasons why historians disagree are many and varied, but the following represent some of them: questions of the selection and relevance of evidence. The decision of 49ers quarterback colin kaepernick to stop standing for the national anthem has provoked a lot of debate, to say the least one part of the argument is about the anthem's little.
Why have historians disagreed about the reason why our founding fathers wrote the constitution to some scholars, the creation of the federal system was an effort to preserve the ideals of the revolution by eliminating the disorder and contention that threatened the new nation it was an effort to create a strong national government capable of exercising real authority. A constitutional proposal for a strengthened congress but one in which each state would have a single vote, thus granting a small state the same legislative power as a large state great compromise 1787 this compromise was between the large and small states of the colonies. With such polarised opinion, one has to ask why historians disagree so vehemently about whether henry v was a successful monarch or not in this essay, i shall be examining what i feel are the main issues surrounding the problem of why historians do not agree whether henry v was a good king.
Many historians have disagreed in the past a great deal even against will many historians have lived under a dictatorship therefore there writings have had to complement the dictators' of that particular country.
Best answer: i'd say it would be because sources can be interpreted differently especially with something that happened a very long time ago, there aren't many primary sources, so historians have to rely on material recorded decades or even centuries after the event occurred.
Why we have libraries jannah b juan of gr 10 rembrandt batch 2011-2012 nerds, bookworms, geeks the most commonly used names for people who frequent libraries the most commonly used names for people who frequent libraries. Why historians have disagreed about the role and significance of monarchs during the wars of the roses june 29, 2015 missward101 the history of the wars of the roses (1455-1487) is convoluted, and the most popular and pervasive views are still largely shaped by the shakespearean influence.